Apologies if this is in any way offensive, however something in a recent Post triggered a line of thinking…wondered whether I have missed or forgotten any theorizing of how Mr Clay might have concocted what we, the public, were meant to surmise/assume/deduct had actually happened to Allison, excluding his involvement? Maybe this has been discussed. Maybe it is off-limits. Just wondered what scenarios were conjured up to explain the absence of Alluson on earth. Was she meant to be found, was she abducted, was it a random late-night kidnap, was it a case of mistaken identity. These things have just started to rattle around in my head. Amazing if one could obliterate another’s existence, in the hope it would blow over and all would be forgotten but great sympathy offered to a ‘loving father and husband’ left to raise 3 beautiful children left motherless for some mysterious, never to be discovered reason. He could even earn some money selling the story, then with flow-ups, grieving husband has found comfort in an understanding new woman…they may even marry…follow up stories for years earning a little more income. Maybe my imagination has got away from me. I shall lock it up in the cupboard. Oh, and just thinking back to the hunter having the boot of his car examined by detectives with gloves. You know, it would be very interesting to know whether we are all wrong in our surmising and a perfectly acceptable explanation is revealed through the court case. PS haven’t been drinking sav blanc yet today so God only knows what will occur if I feed my imagination with a little fertilizer.
↧